Surface modeling tools are not really good Simple drawing rules (compared to Solidworks) Has worked as a consultant for major Swedish companies that have design departments Has drawn in front of large audiences who are amazed at the simplicity of ironcad Which has been a strong selling point for getting a job for my company Can be worked from sketch to finished production drawings, without leaving IronCad.Ĭompletely independent of constrains (simple and forgiving way of working).
Since most of what I do is about automation, usually one machine, ironcad fits perfectly,Ĭompared to colleagues working in other systems (Solidworks,
Has worked for many years with ironcad (started with version 2) The good news is that IC does a good job exporting 2D views of your designs so you can draft them elsewhere.Ĭomments: I have very good experience with ironcad
I have tried both IC's native drawing and CAXA (yes IronCAD has 2 drafting systems!), but neither are fully implemented, efficient or bug free. In my long term opinion IronCAD's 2D drawing utilities have always been lack lustre. When it comes time to build, I use add-ons like IC Mechanical to speed up the design of my steel structures and output 2D files for CNC etc. IronCADs workflow is much less constrained than other products which makes it easier and faster to develop design ideas and concepts. IronCAD dual kernel and translator add-on allow me to import and work with data from a wide array of sources from CG artists through to civil engineers. I work in the feature film industry where everything is extremely time constrained, fast changing and teams are often geographically dispersed. It has helped me successfully design and create designs for feature films, theme parks, race cars, yachts and more.ĭespite its deficiencies I still think its the most flexible and powerful 3D design tool in its class. Comments: I have been a user since 1995 when IronCAD was known as Trispectives. Example: "LOAD Button: Click this button to load. Most entries simply describe the labels that are already readily-visible on a given dialogue box. It actually complicates CAD library management. The single-project-file structure isn't particularly valuable (S/W has the Pack-and-Go feature).
Ironcad compose license#
Being barred from having an account in the forum simply because I chose to purchase a perpetual license and no maintenance plan was quite a slap in the face. It was a bit galling to see the heavily-discounted price offers right after I paid a higher price, and I now see that you tricked your new users into buying a soon-to-be-obsolete version.
Ironcad compose software#
Having the file format change right after I purchased the software and NOT BE BACKWARD-COMPATIBLE was almost a death blow to my continuation as an IronCAD user since it prevents me from adding seats without complications or extra expense of upgrading. Not being able to export to sldasm or sldprt with the translator was an unexpected and stunning deficiency considering the price I paid for the Translator. Dimensions in the 3D module hide by default and it's hit-or-miss as to which object to activate to show a placed dimension. Dimensioning in the 2D drawing module is too erratic to be usable. The parametric architecture is fractured and disjointed. I started a bug list but then stopped because there were so many. It was quite expensive, considering the lack of maturity in the product. The student licensing program was fantastic before it was turned into a subscription-based model. The complementary IronCAD Compose is fabulous. Being able to reorder objects in the model tree without crashing the model. The interface is far more intuitive than PTC Creo. Drag-and-Drop concepting/design is great. This has turned into a very expensive test drive.
Ironcad compose full#
I bought a student license and then bought a full license to do commercial work. Given that you're charging the same price as Dassault and mimicking their student license program, though, it seems that your Product Managers don't realize how far you have to go.
I was really looking forward to supporting an underdog and helping you displace SolidWorks with a superior product. I've since discovered that I can buy a perpetual licenses of SolidWorks FOR THE SAME PRICE and am therefore standardizing on SolidWorks for my engineering firm. It crashed consistently with the large model I loaded, though. I also know that S/W is unstable with models over a certain size (10,000 parts, I think) and was hoping that I/C was more able to handle large models. I bought IronCAD because I didn't realize that Dassault offered a perpetual license for SolidWorks.
0 kommentar(er)
